ALACHUA – The Alachua City Commission voted 3-2 Monday night to approve a controversial comprehensive plan amendment that clears the way for a large-scale mixed-use commercial and residential development known as the Farmlands project along U.S. Highway 441 on the city’s west side, while a companion rezoning ordinance was continued to the commission’s July 27 meeting after the hearing ran past the allotted time.
The vote on Ordinance 26-09, a small-scale future land use map amendment for property owned by JTFA LLC and related entities, came after public comment spanning two commission meetings drew hundreds of written objections as well as spirited supporters. Vice Mayor Jennifer Ringersen, Commissioner Shirley Green Brown and Mayor Walter Welch voted in favor. Commissioners Jacob Fletcher and Jackson Youmas voted no.
The June 8 commission meeting had been the first hearing on both ordinances, but public comment ran so long that commissioners deferred the vote to June 22.
What the project would involve
The Farmlands project covers approximately 182 acres on the south side of U.S. 441, generally in the 16400 to 18800 blocks, and is part of a larger mixed-use planned development previously approved for residential use. The property is currently operated as a commercial tree farm by the Lerner family.
Ordinance 26-09 amends the city’s Future Land Use Map, shifting roughly 33 acres of the project boundary from a mix of Community Commercial, Moderate Density Residential, and Low Density Residential designations to Commercial, Community Commercial, and Moderate Density Residential. The applicants described the change as a reorientation of existing urban land use designations rather than a dramatic expansion of commercial land, noting that the property already carried urban designations under the city’s previous plan.
The broader project, as presented by consultant Clay Sweger of eda consultants, inc., and land use planner Gerry Dedenbach of NV5, envisions a master-planned community with what the applicants described as a cap of 450,000 square feet of commercial space to be locked in by the companion rezoning ordinance, 203 homes, internal sidewalks and trail connections, stormwater management basins, a first segment of a future rail trail along an abandoned rail line on the southern portion of the property, and a new traffic signal on U.S. 441 coordinated with the Florida Department of Transportation and aligned with the Briarwood Town Center development across the highway.
The residential component would reduce the number of permitted lots from a previously approved 275 to 203. Specific commercial tenants were not announced, and neither the applicant nor city officials have publicly identified who would occupy the commercial space.
Speculation has nonetheless run high in the community that Walmart may be interested in anchoring the commercial portion of the site. That rumor has circulated widely and drove much of the public opposition to the project, though it has not been confirmed by the applicant, the property owners, or city officials, and no public denial has been offered either.
Companion Ordinance 26-10 would rezone the same roughly 182-acre property from Community Commercial, Commercial Intensive, and Planned Development Residential to Planned Development Residential and Planned Development Commercial. The applicants emphasized that locking development commitments into the planned development zoning ordinance is what would make the traffic, stormwater, and design promises legally binding. That hearing was underway Monday night when time expired, and commissioners voted unanimously to continue it to July 27.
The opposition
The project drew sustained and intense public opposition in the months leading up to the vote. Dozens of residents sent emails and letters to commissioners urging a no vote, and the June 8 and June 22 meetings drew packed chambers. Opponents centered their concerns on traffic congestion on the already heavily traveled U.S. 441 corridor, the potential impact of a large national retailer on downtown Main Street businesses in Alachua and High Springs, environmental concerns about the Floridan aquifer and stormwater, and what many described as the threatened loss of Alachua’s small-town character.
The possibility of a Walmart coming to the site became a rallying point for opponents throughout the months-long debate, appearing repeatedly in public comment and in the flood of emails sent to commissioners. While the applicant has not named any tenants, that rumor has proven impossible to put to rest, and no one connected to the project has publicly disputed it.
“If we give those things up for some of the current opportunities for development, we’ll just see another town lose its individuality,” said Amanda Howard during public comment. “What continues to preserve our uniqueness here? What continues to preserve our connection, our community closeness?”
Resident Gary Pappas, who lives on Northwest 188th Street directly across from the tree farm property, argued in both written comments and at the podium that the application would permanently change the character of the corridor. During the Ordinance 26-10 quasi-judicial hearing, Pappas presented as an affected party and called two witnesses, including a hydrogeologist who raised concerns about karst geology and proximity to a former Alachua County landfill that operated from 1972 to 1983. The expert, whose testimony was continuing when the meeting ran out of time, noted that monitoring wells at the landfill still show detectable levels of EDB, a contaminant, in the most recent reports available. Applicant-side engineers from UES Professional Solutions disputed the significance of those findings, citing a source removal effort in the 1990s that excavated more than 3,100 tons of contaminated soil to a depth of 80 feet, with remaining monitoring wells showing results below detection limits for contaminants of concern.
Resident Celine Benedict described a fatal crash on U.S. 441 in January in which she and her eight-year-old son suffered serious injuries, and urged the commission to put traffic safety on a future agenda regardless of the outcome of the Farmlands vote.
The supporters
Not all speakers opposed the project. Several residents argued that Alachua’s growth is inevitable and that a well-planned mixed-use development is preferable to piecemeal strip commercial development along 441.
Jeremy Shear, who said he had waited nearly six hours to speak at the June 8 meeting in favor of the project, urged the commission to embrace and shape growth rather than resist it. “Growth is inevitable. Prosperity is not unless we work together,” Shear said. “Collaboration starts with saying yes to growth.”
Chris Beatty made the economic case for approval. “Too often residents have to leave Alachua for everyday needs, including myself, taking time and spending out of our local economy,” Beatty said. “Responsible development can help expand the city’s tax base, create jobs, support local businesses, and generate revenue for important community priorities like infrastructure and public services.”
A lifelong Alachua resident and pastor, Natron Curtis, who spoke at the podium said he wants the next generation to have career options close to home. “My kids don’t have to go to Orlando or Atlanta to find a good job,” he said. “They can stay right here in the city that they love.”
Gustavo Avalos read a letter from a coworker employed by one of the companies seeking to locate in Alachua, describing how working for that employer allowed her to buy a home, raise two children, and advance from an hourly associate to assistant general manager without a college degree.
The deliberation
Commissioner Fletcher said he would not vote based on fear, whether from residents or from arguments that rejecting the project would lead to something worse. He said the traffic analysis showed only a marginal improvement, that property values near the project would be harmed, and that placing large-scale commercial development on the city’s edge is the same linear development pattern the applicant claimed to be avoiding. “I will be voting no,” Fletcher said.
Commissioner Youmas also voted no, raising questions during deliberation about the FDOT improvement timeline and whether a private developer’s funding commitment could truly accelerate state transportation projects.
Vice Mayor Ringersen took the chair for the proceedings and announced the result after polling commissioners. Mayor Welch voted yes, and Ringersen declared her own vote before calling the final tally.
“I’m voting yes. I will call the vote three to two,” Ringersen said, before returning the gavel to Mayor Welch.
The Ordinance 26-10 rezoning hearing will resume at the commission’s July 27 meeting. The applicants have emphasized that without the implementing zoning, the approved land use change has little practical effect, as it is the planned development ordinance that would legally bind the commitments for traffic improvements, stormwater management, residential design standards, emergency-only access to Northwest 188th Street, and limits on commercial square footage well below what the current zoning already permits.
# # #
email editor@
alachuatoday.com
